Perhaps this is why sex is so elusive....

I spent a few hours this morning discussing philosophy battles with my friend Chris. Here are some highlights from the absurdly dorky conversation:



WastyMcWasted: Who would win in a philosophy fight? Nietchze or Kierkegaard?
F atn wA: that is a good question because neither is in the analytic tradition
F atn wA: probably nietchze, but kierkegaard would show up
F atn wA: playing kierkegaard would be like playing at oregon, jsut a game no one wants


WastyMcWasted: We should make a bracket.
F atn wA: a bracket of 64?
F atn wA: kant boycotts in a huff, because he is given the #1 seed in the far east region
WastyMcWasted: Kant would be favored in every round by at least 12, and the spread would move up to 15 the first hour.
F atn wA: the overall #3 seed, but the book has him at 3:1 to win it, followed by #2 aristotle at 5:1, and #1 overall plato at 8:1 WastyMcWasted: The best would be the #4 seed Descartes being a dog in the opener
F atn wA: he would be the worst road player in the tournament


WastyMcWasted: Oh, and whoever drew Rawls would stab himself
F atn wA: the classic 8-9 matchup, rawls vs. nozik
WastyMcWasted: The Libertarian vs. the Liberalist?
F atn wA: ya the taylor-made 7:30 game on cbs
WastyMcWasted: "I'm gonna fuck you up, because I believe in regulated capitalism or modified socialist economies, BITCH!"

WastyMcWasted: Where would Marx be?
F atn wA: oh god
F atn wA: jsut as a philosopher?
WastyMcWasted: I think so, yeah
F atn wA: disregarding his other accomplishments would be like throwing that cincinatti team in without kenyon martin
WastyMcWasted: "Still above par, but..."
F atn wA: ...